IV. Examples of the deficiencies in the administrative operations of the IA and the damage such lapses have caused the church
Note: In order to
1) discuss the deficiencies in the IA’s administrative operations and
2) find solution(s) to them, I have had to use specific IA administrative details in this section. I would like to apologize once again to Elder Lin, as his conduct forms the center of this discussion.
While working with Elder Lin for 28 months, I discovered that there were often deficiencies in the IA’s administrative operations. Due to space constraints, this chapter provides only six examples and, through them, elaborates on the extensiveness and seriousness of the lapses in the administrative operations of the present-day IA.
By examining these deficiencies, the reader could gain an inkling as to how Elder Lin, the
chief executive officer of the IA, has used lies, fabricated documents and dishonest tactics to
mislead his co-workers, causing the church to suffer unprecedented damage and destruction.
As a result, the IA has lost its honesty, justice and righteousness, and the church and all her
members have been shamed.
4.1
Typical examples of the deficiencies in the IA’s administrative operations
Elder Lin’s Modes of Operation
Example 1:
During IA meetings, Elder Lin assumes three roles with mutually conflicting interests
(the defendant, the legislator and the judge) with the aim of controlling the
proceedings and outcomes of IA meetings (see Evidence, pp. 2–7).
One may wonder:
Why does Elder Lin insist on assuming these 3 mutually conflicting roles at each and
every IA meeting? Below is my observation and analysis:
a. Recognizing the seriousness of the IA’s administrative operation lapses that I had documented
in my reports, the IA Standing Committee forwarded the case to the IA EXCO on October 20,
2011 and requested the IA EXCO to lead the discussion / investigation.
b. Elder Lin knew well that these IA’s administrative deficiencies were actual and accurate.
c. In order to keep a lid on IA operational deficiencies and his wrongdoings, Elder Lin resolved
that he has to control the discussions, proceedings and outcomes of IA meetings. The best way
to achieve these goals is for Elder Lin to assume three different roles whenever IA deficiencies
are discussed. In so doing, it allowed Elder Lin
--1) as the Defendant to preside over the IA
meetings,
--2) as the Legislator to control the direction and the content of discussions, and
--3) as the judge to write up the meeting minutes according to his personal biased views.
Finally,
Elder Lin can quote his fabricated meeting minutes as the resolutions made by the IA EXCO to
mislead the church, her membership and to control public opinion on the matter.
d. When the IA EXCO considered my report at its March 22-23, 2012 meeting in Seoul, Korea,
Elder Lin used these tactics to achieve his goals and objectives. As a result,
-i. The IA operational deficiencies identified in my reports with specific evidences were
deemed not-objective and did not hold water
-ii. These “conclusions” were “reached” not based on IA EXCO’s discussion, verification
and voting but based on Elder Lin’s trickery.
-iii. Elder Lin can then cite such fabricated IA EXCO meeting minutes to prove “his
innocent” and proclaim that he had been misunderstood and he had done no wrong.
e. Elder Lin, however, has forgotten that the omnipotent, omniscient and holy God is fully aware
of the work of his hands and the schemes of his heart.
f. The two fabricated IA meeting minutes (i.e. IA letter #12-030 and #12-033) cited in the
Evidence section as well as IA operation lapses identified here are they not direct evidences to
prove that it is Elder Lin himself who is unobjective.
g. These two false meeting minutes provide the most direct and powerful proof of the manner in
which Elder Lin has operated, led the IA administration, misled his co-workers and influenced
the opinions of the church—through the use of lies, his power and influence, and with a heart
that neither fears God nor man. As a result, the IA has become confused about right and wrong,
is unable to distinguish between true and false, and has been thrown into chaos.
Example 2:
Because the omnipotent and omniscient God is the master of the church, the IA has
not set up a system of supervision and evaluation. Elder Lin, however, has exploited
this weakness and misled his co-workers out of his own private goals and prejudiced
intentions, causing the IA to make some wrong decisions.
a. The vast majority of workers in the true church have devoted their lives to serving God and
leading people to the Lord with all their heart and strength because of their gratitude for the
grace of the Lord. The church is the household of God; the omnipotent and omniscient God is
the supervisor of His church. As a result, the IA has not set up a system of supervision and
evaluation. Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the workers work with diligence and
sincerity for the sake of the gospel.
b. Elder Lin has often exploit this honour system, coupled with the fact that the other EXCO
members often only have a partial knowledge of the issues at hand, to mislead his co-workers
in IA meetings, such that they end up making incorrect decisions during the meetings.
c. Once the matter has been voted through in this manner, Elder Lin
-1) then uses this (the
resolution of the IA Executive Committee) as a token of authority and announces to the wider
world that he is simply carrying out the decisions of the IA EXCO, and
-2) uses this token of authority to repeatedly discredit and attack the believers who have admonished him.
d. Elder Lin also often makes use of his position as chair of IA meetings to adopt arguments
which are in line with his own purposes; any evidence which puts him in an unfavourable light
is not taken into consideration. Such practices provide Elder Lin with the opportunity to
quickly turn his one-sided and biased views into the outcomes and resolutions of IA meetings,
and then to record these erroneous decisions in the form of IA documents, which are then
distributed to churches all over the world, thus confusing the facts.
e. Take, for example, the IA meeting held on March 23, 2012 in Korea: Elder Lin
-1) With no evidence whatsoever, unfairly pronounced my letters and report to be unobjective,
-2) fabricated IA meeting minutes,
-3) produced IA documents to fulfil his own personal ends, and
-4) used these documents to discredit me the whistle blower, bringing me greater insult and
humiliation than I have ever experienced in my life.
f. Consider:
i. When a member, knowing nothing of the matter, uses Elder Lin’s fabricated IA
documents as “proof” and starts proclaiming everywhere that
--1) I have written an
unobjective report in order to attack church ministers,
--2) that I have not listened to the IA’s advice…etc.
ii. Elders, deacons and preachers of the IA, if I had not received the above cited IA meeting
minutes,
--1) how am I to know that I have not been falsely accused by Elder Lin at IA
meeting?
--2) how am I to find recipient of the subject IA meeting minutes that I may talk with
him, clarify things and defend my reputation?
--3) how am I, my children, grandchildren and loved ones, to deal with the
unwarranted attacks and slander of such a recipient, who attacks me solely on
the basis of Elder Lin’s lies?
--4) As stewards of the household of God, why have you ignored the numerous
warning signs these many years concerning the IA’s administrative lapses and
failed to deal with them? Because of this, the church today has become an
organization which is untrue, unjust, and unrighteous, and has even been taken
advantage of by the wicked (see Evidence, pp. 26–40)!
g. Elder Lin’s unbiblical tactics and practices
--1) have not only harmed many innocent believers
and church workers
--2) but also caused divisions and misunderstandings amongst members and
--3) led to great turmoil in the church. These damages are direct result of:
---i. it is difficult for the IA and the church to retract IA documents once they have been sent
out;
---ii. all recipients of fabricated IA documents (i.e. the GA members worldwide and local
church council members) would never believe that the IA documents they had received
had been fabricated and were false.
h. Therefore, in accordance with the instructions of the IA, they submissively put up the
documents on their notice boards and announce their contents to the congregation.
i. As such, the false documents sent out by the IA have not only contrary to the facts, confused
the opinions of the church and polluted the minds of the believers; in future, they would likely
become major obstacles and cause great difficulties if the church were to attempt to overturn
this resolution.
j. May God comfort and sustain me and other church members and workers who have been
discredited and wronged by Elder Lin so that we may safely pass through this difficult and
painful path.
k. More importantly, we pray that the loving heavenly Father and true God may grant grace and
mercy to the church, that she may quickly realize her errors, earnestly repent and ask God for
His forgiveness, so that she is not cast aside by Him.
No comments:
Post a Comment