Example 3:
How did Elder Lin turn a simple request into his Waterloo? (see Evidence, pp. 45–98)
a. After 18 months (2010.09.16–2012.03.31) of continual lying, Elder Lin finally admitted on March 31, 2012 that, in regard to the 37 pages of IA document, he had 1) fabricated documents and 2) misled the IA Executive Committee.
b. Between 2010.09.16–2012.03.31 when Elder Lin and I worked together, he managed to come up with at least 5 different lies and false testimonies concerning this simple 37 pages of IA document!
The fact: On September 16, 2010, Elder Lin handed me 29 pages, and Elder Tse handed me 8 pages (making 37 pages in total). The followings are the 5 lies and false testimonies Elder Lin made at various occasions to various IA EXCO members.
---i. “What the IA provided to Brother Young in Sept 2010 is what he needs to know” (an email from Elder Lin to the IA EXCO members on March 21, 2011). [Note: these 37 pages of document is a small fraction of the IA archives which are more than 700 pages. What depicted in these 37 pages is a biased view of the dispute between Pr. YM and the IA].
---ii. Elder Lin manufactured a false set of these documents and told IA EXCO members "this [his falsified documents] was what IA sent to Brother Young in Sept 2010”. (in an email from Elder Lin to the IA EXCO members on March 21, 2011) [Note: Elder Lin's false testimony and fabricated documents mismatched the genuine documents by more than 45%]
---iii. “All 37 pages were provided by Elder Tse.” (Elder Lin’s written declaration, from the reference material prepared for a special meeting with five senior elders held on November 28, 2011 in Taiwan, Taichung.)
---iv. “I don’t remember having given you [Brother Young] any documents. These documents were -typed out by my secretary.” (the testimony of Elder Lin during a meeting with me, my wife and four IA EXCO members held on March 31, 2012 in Taipei church)
---v. Toward the end of March 31, 2012 meeting, Elder Lin admitted that he was wrong and he had lied and mislead others. (the testimony of Elder Lin during a meeting with four IA EXCO members who reside in Taiwan, my wife and I, held on March 31, 2012 in Taipei church]
c. Think about it:
Being the IA chairman, Elder Lin ought to be the most spiritual member of the church’s administrative staff, yet
---i. He lied for more than 1 year and half. He spent 18 months on crooked byways before speaking the truth.
---ii. During this time, Elder Lin did all he could to distort the facts and cover up the wrongs he had committed, thus misled the church on what truly happened, caused the church to lose her truth, integrity, justice and righteousness?
---iii. In addition, in this particular matter, Elder Lin biasedly handpicked specific documents that support his subjective views from 700+ page of archives and told the IA EXCO and me that these 37 IA documents are what I need to know was autocratic (refusing to provide me with any other documents and insisting I should just follow his commands and do what he asks me to do! )
---iv. Fabricated documents and sent spurious documents to mislead his coworkers, and discredited and attacked church members who pointed out his mistakes
---v. Bore false witness against the whistle blower (with the false document he had fabricated, Elder Lin clearly and directly implied that the 37 pages of IA document in my possession were false).
d. Elder Lin’s wrongdoings in these simple matters gives observers the chance to understand 1) Elder Lin’s modes operation, his characters and his mentality, 2) the content, frequency, severity and ubiquity of the deficiencies in the administrative operations of the IA.
Example 4:
Being the most senior person in the IA administration, Elder Lin knows the law, yet he breaks it. Moreover, when his mistakes are pointed out to him, he hardens his heart and refuses to admit his mistakes or to correct them (see Evidence, pp. 99–100).
a. The bylaws and constitution of the IA clearly stipulate that:
---i. the IA Standing Committee comes above the chairmanship of the IA,
---ii. the IA Executive Committee comes above the IA Standing Committee,
---iii. the IA Truth Research Committee (TRC) comes above the IA Executive Committee, and
---iv. the World Delegates Conference comes above the IA’s TRC.
b. The smooth and peaceful functioning of the IA depends on each organizational unit, with each doing its part and respecting and helping the other units.
c. As the IA chairman, Elder Lin is well aware that he and the IA administrative department which he leads needs to 1) carry out the directives and meeting resolutions of the above four organizational bodies, and 2) report “upwardly”, regularly and truthfully to these four bodies concerning the affairs and state of progress of the IA [i.e. IA chairman reports to → 1) IA Standing Committee → 2) IA EXCO → 3) IA TRC and → 4) WDC].
d. In practice, however, Elder Lin often ignores this requirement, acts alone and puts himself above these four organizational bodies. For instance,
---i. Elder Lin has fabricated the meeting minutes of the IA EXCO as well as those of the IA Standing Committee,
---ii. Elder Lin and the IA’s administrative department violated the rules and tampered with the meeting minutes of the IA EXCO,
---iii. Elder Lin has not carried out the meeting resolutions of the IA EXCO and the IA Standing Committee,
---iv. the IA EXCO, led by Elder Lin, has infringed upon the powers of the WDC,
---v. when his above mistakes are pointed out, Elder Lin hardens his heart and refuses to admit his mistakes, instead Elder Lin uses administrative procedures to crush and discredit those who complain against him.
e. These administrative lapses have caused the IA to
-1) become a one-man organization,
-2) lose its order, harmony, truth, justice, integrity and righteousness, and
-3) brought shame to God, the church and all her members.
No comments:
Post a Comment